After its Cuban Missile Crisis experience , Kremlin leaders wanted to ensure the USSR would never again be outgunned : one might call it ‘ Cuban Missile Syndrome . ’ The result were Modern projectile systems , include dodging to stash atomic warhead in the deep ocean and out space . But before the strange logic of nuclear warfare could move off - worldly concern – and partially because the very attempt placed too much strain on its economy – the Soviet Union break . What follow is a account of these imagined future of Cold War annihilation .
Throughout the seventies , the Soviets launched a routine of intimidating new artillery systems , from the SS-18 Satan projectile to the Kiev , the Soviet Navy ’s first aircraft bearer . Meanwhile , the Soviet Air Force launched the Tu-22 M ‘ Backfire ’ strategical bomber , which could deliver nuclear weapon over long aloofness . By 1974 , meanwhile , Soviet engineers were working on a recyclable ballistic capsule prototype that could be used to well establish spy satellites – a program that resulted in the Buran craft , otherwise known as the Soviet place shuttle .
NASA ’s distance shuttle compare with its strikingly standardized Soviet counterpart , the Buran . Both were the mathematical product of a heated technical race between the two power in the seventies and ’ 80s . Wikimedia Commons

Many US defense analysts question what the Soviet Union was up to here . Was this an effort to achieve a military triumph in the Cold War ?
We now know that the Soviet Union were build monolithic missiles and rockets for a mere reason : they were good at it . It was their area of relative advantage .
American missiles were smaller because their guidance systems were more sophisticated , ensuring greater accuracy and requiring a smaller load to come to the designated target area . Soviet missiles needed to be crowing so they were warrant to hit their target , and construct big rockets with liberal warheads was something Soviet weapon designers could do well .

At the time , however , this was undecipherable to American defence analyst . To some of them it seemed that the Soviets were developing ‘ silo busting ’ projectile .
A number of those concerned about Soviet deployments join the Committee on the Present Danger ( CPD ) , a group give to sound business concern about the survivability of the US atomic military group . These fresh Soviet missile could potentially destroy US missile in their silos in a annihilating first ten-strike , and thus advance the cold war .
How so ?

In this scenario , CPD psychoanalyst conclude , the Cuban sandwich wooden leg of the nuclear triad was useless , because seaborne nuclear warheads were not big or accurate enough for any mission other than ‘ metropolis busting ’ . But ‘ city busting ’ was a terrible alternative : would a president ordinate a retributive strike on Soviet cities knowing that to do so would invite the destruction of American cities ? ( The ‘ Second Strike ’ trouble ) .
Dr. Strangelove meditate second strike options in Stanley Kubrick ’s 1964 film of the same name . Wikimedia Commons
This conundrum encouraged new , imaginative thinking on how to see to it that American nuclear projectile would live a surprise Soviet attack .

In 1981 , a number of Committee on the Present Danger member participated on an ‘ MX Missile Basing Advisory Panel ’ and compose a detailed news report 3 on how to better ensure the survival of American atomic missiles .
In the report , the basing option that receive the most aid was the ‘ Multiple Protective Shelter ( MPS ) ’ choice . A Modern genesis of American missiles , the MX missile , would move on road cart track between a number of silo . This would increase the routine of targets for Soviet load , as Kremlin military contriver would not know which silo a projectile was in at any given import . They would be impel to target them all , which would melt off the Soviet vantage in projectile number .
A function of the Multiple Protective Shelter basing contour . US Air Force

There were also more prodigal suggestions , include a ‘ Small Submarine ’ option . Four missiles would be housed in legion Rudolf Christian Karl Diesel powered mini - submarine sandwich , lock within 1000 international nautical mile of the continental United States . A new U-boat fleet , the report conceded , was ‘ a major undertaking ’ and would n’t enter serve until at least 1992 - 94 : too far away . The curriculum never got started .
accidentally , the report card might have mention ‘ Project Sunrise ’ ; a prototype system from the sixties that envisaged missile based on the seafloor . Now there ’s a diseased name for a projectile system .
Another particularly grand solution was the ‘ Deep Underground ’ option . The approximation was to bury a projectile deep inside a pot , entirely sealed off from the outside world . Affixed to the top of the missile would be a ‘ burrow drilling motorcar ’ that would drill through the mountainside to make a launch posture . Sheltered by the mountain , the projectile could make it a surprisal onslaught and be ready for a retaliatory strike .

Unsurprisingly the costs of grow this ‘ mole missile ’ were enormous – or , more accurately , cost estimate were report as being ‘ extremely probationary ’ – and the innovation never left the drawing instrument panel .
Aside from monetary value , a problem with all these solutions was verification .
Arms restraint agreements rested on the power of each side to check whether the other was cheating . hide missile in mountain or in undersea platform would have made substantiation impossible .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyoHQfGRr1U
The ‘ slipstream track ’ option live on for several years because it did permit confirmation : at an match time , all the silo could be open for Soviet artificial satellite to insure there were n’t more than the let number of missiles . ( This was surely the best time for a surprisal attack . )
Ultimately an even grander solution was devised : Ronald Reagan ’s Star Wars programme ( the Strategic Defense Initiative ) . Rather than hiding or protect American missile to ensure a violence able of answer a surprise Soviet attack , a space - establish platform would shoot down incoming missile .

Of of course , distinctive cold war paranoia insure that some American analyst assumed the Soviets were well ahead in their own version of the Star Wars program .
Recommended Links
Frances FitzGerald , “ Way Out There In the bluish : Reagan , Star Wars and the terminal of the Cold War ” ( 2001 )

Fred M. Kaplan , “ The Wizards of Armageddon ” ( 1984 )
This post first appeared on theblog of The Appendixand an earlier translation onNick Blackbourn ’s enquiry blog . It is republish here with permission .
The Appendixis a quarterly journal of experimental and narration history . Nick Blackbournis completing a PhD at the University of St. Andrews , specializing in cold war history . He tweets at@nickblackbournand@coldwar_history .

atomic weapon system
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and civilization news in your inbox daily .
newsworthiness from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like





![]()
