Research has now record that the main element of fluid produced by “ squirting ” is pee and sometimes may bear fluid from the female prostate ( Skene ’s glands – two glands located on either side of the urethra ) . Yes , there was a study on this , that was O.K. by the Ethics Committee of Okayama Central Hospital , and the method subdivision of the paper is very intense .

For many centuries , there has been the enigma of what and where the liquid that is kick out during vaginal sexual intercourse is and add up from . It was even observe in the fourth century in several Formosan Taoist schoolbook .

During vaginal sexual stimulus , when an climax is reach fluid can be chuck out from the urethra . Until recently , all of the fluid that was expelled was described as distaff ejaculation . However , one paperdifferentiated this further , distinguish any abundant fluid as “ squirting ” and the smaller measure of fluid described as “ thick and milklike ” as distaff interjection .

Squirting and distaff ejaculation are also very different from urinary dissoluteness , as the former two are attain during an coming . Typically , ifurinary incontinencehappens during sexual intercourse , the woman is often aware of it happening and it is prostate - specific antigen ( PSA ) negative .

It is think that 10 - 54 percent of women are capable of squirting , and often the volume expelled is 1 - 900 cubic centimetre . Despite this , the components of the fluid and how it is discharged are relatively unknown .

There have been a few experiments done on this topic before . In one 2014 study , Salamaet al , determined the makeup of the piss before and after sexual coitus by echography .

In this current study , there were five voluntarily consented woman that all report that they were able to squeeze out . The paper also explicitly mentioned multiple meter that the subjects were not gender proletarian as they wanted to obviate the possibility of squirt as an act .

Before the experiment , a urethral catheter was inserted into the vesica and piss was collected . The enquiry squad injected a mixture of indigo carmine and saline – this was to make any secretions hopeful dark low-spirited ( hopefully to speciate from anything usually release from their bodies ) .

Then the participants were sexually stimulated by hand or by a penis ( although the paper never mentioned whose ) . For those that had penile foreplay , he was teach to put a condom on , before the investigator give out into the adjacent room – presumably to give them secrecy – before insert the room again before the squirting natural action begin . Although it was observe afterwards on , that the prophylactic - penile stimulation was not enough so the manly volunteer had to remove it during coition , but it was assure that he did not ejaculate .

The resulting liquid was collected and test for PSA and glucose , oh … and the result was verified by a video recording .

In the collected liquid , all five sample were blue . This indicates that the blue dyestuff mixed with the urine .

Four samples out of five had PSA notice and there was one cleaning lady who had very high level of PSA . Although the volunteered man report that in the gamey - level PSA sample distribution , something was bulging in the G - spot before the squirting began , this may indicate develop Skene ’s glands . It was also unclear in these four samples if the ejaculatory fluid was excreted during “ squirting ” or if it was released first .

None of the women reported a maven of urinary incontinence during the experiment .

The paper did take note that the method acting of collection was sometimes variable , as the researcher did not want to upset the sexual stimulation . Also , the sampling compile in those who had penile stimulation without a condom could have induce PSA taint on the manful side .

Very unsurprisingly , the researcher ’s found that this written report was very difficult to regain subject area for .

The study was publish in theInternational Journal of Urology .

[ H / T : New Scientist ]